Four questions on the Financial System
(582 reads)
Four questions on the Financial System
Thu, 04/12/2008 - 13:47
Why do governments choose to borrow money from private banks at interest when government could create all the interest-free money it needs, itself?
Why create money as debt? Why not create money that circulates permanently?
How can a money system dependent on perpetually accelerating growth be used to build a sustainable economy?
What specifically needs to be changed to allow the creation of a stable economy?
- Login to post comments
Four answers on the financial system
(1) If the government prints money the result will simply be inflation and depreciation of the currency, not increased spending power. There may be some short- or even medium-term boost to the economy from cheaper money, but bear in mind that cheap borrowing is one of the reasons we got into this mess in the first place. Asia was saving, we were all borrowing and spending. We coudln't live beyond our means for ever - it had to stop some time.
(2) Money is a promise of future goods, services or work, or a sign that they have already been supplied. You cannot simply cretate it. The amazing thing is that we all manage to use it successfully without really understanding that. We treat those little bits of paper and metal as if they are valuable objects, yet their value derives only from a combination of convention and mutual understanding, admittedly enshrined in law.
(3) The amount of money in circulation needs to be appropriate for the amount of goods and services being exchanged. Too much and the money becomes less valauble (inflation); too little and it reduces the amount of exchange (recession). But even the world's best economists still don't know how best to strike this balance.
(4) We need a better understanding of how markets really work. Standard economics cannot explain why bubbles form, what can be done to prevent them, and why markets are so volatile. Economists (and, as is probably obvious, I am one) need dose of humility. Financial crises have been with us since the dawn of capitallism and we still don't know why they happen and how to avoid them. For me, behavioural economics is the most promising route to better understanding and, ultimately, better policy-making.
Behaviouralist
Thank you for taking the time to respond to my questions.
However I do feel that you a properly taking into account the fractional reserve system of credit and banking in existence in the world today and as such your answers do not satisfy my questions.
These four questions were brought to my attention by this short film by economist Paul Grignon, made freely available on GoogleVideo http://tinyurl.com/yr554g
I ask you to watch this video and respond to the issues raised by it, as having watched it twice now myself, I simply do not possess the requisite knowledge or education to justify our current global monetary system in light of the evidence raised therein.
It would be greatly appreciated by me if you took the time out of your day to watch this 47 minute video, it has certainly completely changed my understanding and concept of Money that previously was very close to the answers you provided. Unfortunately I am neither articulate enough nor possess the time to accurately summarize the points raised by Paul Grignon in this film, nor do I possess the wisdom to improve upon his descriptions and further simplify an extremely complicated subject.
Hmm an inability to edit ones own posts is a major shortfalling of this forum,
*However I do feel that a properly = However I do not feel that you are properly